The Educator's PLN

The personal learning network for educators

Okay, here goes...

 

According to Making Standards Useful in the Classroom by Marzano, a “score 2″ will begin with a strand such as “The student exhibits no major errors or omissions regarding the simpler details and processes such as… However, the student exhibits major errors or omissions withscore 3 elements“. 

 

So, in the context of a standards-based grading system, what would be the appropriate way to handle a student who clearly understands the process of long division, but is making simple mistakes in addition?

 

I think this would be a case of understanding the score 3 elements, but missing the smaller details. How would this be scored?

 

My thinking so far:  Possibly, the since the student is displaying errors in simpler details, they have not demonstrated a score 2 proficiency and need to be recorded at the score 1 level... but I could also see arguments for score 2 and score 3.

Views: 130

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This may not be helpful with the question at hand, but in the big picture the student shouldn't be anywhere near a long-division problem if they have not mastered simple addition, especially in a true standards-based system.

Thanks Ryan.  That's a really good point.  I was thinking more about making simple mistakes because they are going to fast or don't really care about the work in front of them.  I suppose if they routinely are making simple mistakes, though, it would be time to take a step back and make sure the basics are mastered before moving on.

 

Thanks.

Could you also offer grades to the student throughout the division process so that they can better visualize where they are moving too fast? One problem may end up with two or three grades, witch each one written right next to each step in the process.

Another great idea, Ryan.  I don't actually teach math myself.  (I'm just preparing some things for some colleagues).  I'll pass this on.

 

Thank you!

RSS

About

Thomas Whitby created this Ning Network.

Latest Activity

Norma-Jean Nielsen replied to Andrea Ray's discussion Is Professional Development Still a Joke?
"Thank you Shawn for your insights. My EdD research (2018) around professional development of college teachers in rural locations (in Ontario, Canada) indicated that agency and institutional support were key factors in active professional…"
Jan 13
Shawn Mitchell replied to Andrea Ray's discussion Is Professional Development Still a Joke?
"Professional Development: A Quality of a Great Teacher Without concrete development, we cannot have the positive impact a person can make in society. A person who is sixteen or eighteen can have more intelligence than a thirty-year-old. But the same…"
Jan 13
Shawn Mitchell replied to Andrea Ray's discussion Is Professional Development Still a Joke?
"Professional Development: A Quality of a Great Teacher Without concrete development, we cannot have the positive impact a person can make in society. A person who is sixteen or eighteen can have more intelligence than a thirty-year-old. But the same…"
Jan 13
Shawn Mitchell replied to Joel Josephson's discussion Live concert for schools - International European education project
"Reading through the brochure you have posted here gives me a great set of emotions regarding your thoughts. The culture of music is longer than we can imagine and every country in the world has a set of the top musicians for their crowd and public.…"
Jan 12
Debra Lynn Holcomb-Williams updated their profile
Jan 5
Louise Grady updated their profile
Jan 4
Steve Brandidge updated their profile
Dec 29, 2021
Heidi Dayne Hanson updated their profile
Nov 28, 2021

Events

© 2022   Created by Thomas Whitby.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service