The personal learning network for educators
Comment
I currently teach kindergarten and I don't know if a computer could ever replace a kindergarten teacher. I say this because this a student's true first beginning to school. Yes, they may have had pre-school, but for most kindergarteners they are now headed to the "big" school. The first six weeks are crucial in kindergarten and students are so young and can be so apprehensive. This time of year is very hectic and stressful as students are adjusting.
Students are learning the basics of school such as raising hands, treating others nicely, walking in a line, etc. Amongst, these things students are also building relationships with one another and with their teacher. How well can students build a relationship with a computer?
While I do think technology is important, especially in the 21st century, I just don't think a computer could replace a teacher.
Unfortunately, at the levels far above those of us who are using tools of presentation, monitoring, evaluating, differentiating, being the liaison between parent and student, diffusing normal teenage arguments, modeling how to be productive members of society, etc. etc. are individuals who are basing decisions on economic and 'theoretical' premises.
To many of them, the idea of replacing (for example) elective course teachers with what they consider 'online equivalents' will save money and still offer credits in these areas. It seems cost effective to have 25 students in computer lab learning perhaps 6 different electives online. Those of us who actually TEACH one-on-one in the classroom realize their folly in this thinking.
The kids of the current generations are already quite happy to function in their own electronic world of communication without having to 'live in the moment' of what is currently happening around them in the physical world. Replacing teachers with online "equivalents" seems the next natural step.
To me, it seems like we are cultivating these students to identify TOO WELL with the growing number of autistic children/people . . . .those in their own little world, socially inept, inflexible, and extremely reluctant to deal with social situations.
Thanks for your comments, Ashley. Its interesting that you brought up low income students and how it brought a new perspective that they would not have otherwise seen. I've noticed many students, mostly from low income families, but not always, that have never been exposed to computers. (I know, hard to believe, for us geeks!) For some students, I see the idea of computers replacing teachers, or becoming their teachers similar to culture shock, like learning a whole new language. Also for some students, physical teachers in the classroom is the only real exposure they have in social interactions with adults. Some crave the hugs and the positive contact. I don't see computers or any technology being able to fulfill this need.
I, too, look forward to more responses.
Michelle,
This is such an interesting topic in education. I am recently graduated from undergraduate studies and it seems that even in the past two years, there has been a huge push for technology in the classrooms. At my previous district, the 8th graders took an econ class via web. For low income students, it was engaging and brought a new perspectivce that they would not have seen otherwise. However, I feel that technology is for exposure and experience. Computers don't have compassion and they can not talk to children about their feelings. We will see technology go only so far, but they have limits.
I look forward to more responses!
© 2021 Created by Thomas Whitby.
Powered by
You need to be a member of The Educator's PLN to add comments!
Join The Educator's PLN