The Educator's PLN

The personal learning network for educators

Is merit pay for teachers best for students?

If you walk into a teacher's lounge, and your goal is to get the teachers really fired up...then ask them how they feel about merit pay! Teachers across the nation are torn in their beliefs when it comes to merit pay. For every teacher that supports merit pay, there is a teacher who firmly disagrees with merit pay. Educational reform would not be complete without some kind of overhaul in the way teachers are compensated. In the current form most teachers are paid based on their years of service and education, and in my opinion there are several flaws with this type of compensation setup. It would be easy to think the longer a teacher has taught, the more effective he/she is, however that is not always the case. Additionally, it would be easy to think the more education a teacher has, the more effective he/she is, and as before mentioned this is not always the case. Taking a small step back, I think the million dollar question should be, not how much should we pay teachers, but rather does compensation and pay always have to be in the form of money?

Research has continually shown that merit pay can have adverse effects on teacher and student achievement, rather than the expected increases in performance. When teachers are paid based on their individual performance it has been reported to negatively affect the relationships teachers have with each other. The collaborative nature that is essential to the efficiency and improvement of education is greatly reduced when teachers feel they are working for their own benefit, and not for the benefit of the team.

Perhaps the biggest concern with merit pay is the way teacher performance is determined. Should we use the results of one test per year to determine the overall effectiveness of a teacher, or should we use the grades of students for one teacher versus the grades of students from another teacher? The validity of merit pay is called into question because we are trying to make teacher performance into a black and white image, when as every educator knows, there is nothing black and white about education.

The elephant in the room can not be ignored. What really motivates and drives teachers? Money, fringe benefits, personal drivers, huge signing bonuses, lavish lifestyles and celebrity status? I think not, so then why is money and compensation such a big deal? Most teachers did not enter the teaching profession for money. We never thought being a teacher would put us on the same level as a professional athlete or a big name actor or actress. We were motivated and driven by the idea of impacting the lives of students. We wanted to inspire, motivate, encourage, teach, develop, mold, educate, guide, strengthen, create, stimulate, enhance, discover and influence the lives of our students in a positive and meaningful way.

Daniel Pink, wrote a fantastic book called Drive. This book outlines the basic principles that motivate humans. The basic principles were not celebrity status, they were not huge pay checks, they were not fancy cars and big houses, they were much simpler. Human nature requires autonomy, mastery and purpose to be motivated and driven. I am not saying merit pay is wrong, because there are states and districts using merit pay with increases in teacher and student performance. On the other hand, I am not saying merit pay is right, because there are also schools who have used merit pay and have seen a decrease in teacher and student performance. My main point is this: I urge educators to realize there is not a silver bullet to fixing and reforming education. There are many components to the educational process that need to evaluated simultaneously. There is only one part of education that is simple and straight forward...EVERY DECISION WE MAKE NEEDS TO BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE STUDENTS.

Please respond to this post with comments and feedback because I would really like to hear what people have to say about this topic. Thank you!

Views: 153


You need to be a member of The Educator's PLN to add comments!

Join The Educator's PLN

Comment by Justin Tarte on August 2, 2010 at 8:24am
Frank - I totally agree. We should be encouraging a collaborative atmosphere that centers on working as a team. Cross-curricular curricula need to be the norm, not the exception. We should be concentrating on utilizing each others resources to have a positive and meaningful impact on our students.
Comment by Frank C. Vovk on August 1, 2010 at 7:48pm
Merit pay is wrong for the following reasons. 1) It presupposes that the teachers are not doing enough and need financial incentive to do their job well. 2) The carrot (money) is being used on people who have clearly stated that more time rather than more money is what they want - the message you are sending here is that you are not listening to them. 3) Educators of students from great families will naturally get merit pay while those teachers who work harder for their money (ie working with students who struggle) will get less - you are now setting up a class system in the school - which is great because teahers are never caddy!

A system that would work would treat teachers like the professionals they were trained to be. 1) Give every dept a secretary to do the paperwork 2) Let the teachers collaborate in a conference room with a) story boards b) a secretary c) a projector and d) laptops. Instead of listing off any other imporvements, just try to imagine what you would give a set of professionals in any other field to complete a project. As we used to say in the military crap in = crap out.
Comment by Patricia Chujman on July 31, 2010 at 1:14pm
Great article! I completely agree with the idea that we, teachers, alwasys work for the benefit of our students. We may complain about pay ( I think merit pay could work just for some people) but when we set down to work we do our best independently of the pay!


Thomas Whitby created this Ning Network.

Latest Activity

Shawn Mitchell replied to Katherine Maloney's discussion Leveraging the Potential of Personal Learning Networks for Teacher Professional Development - Doctoral Research Study
"In a time of exponential change, affordable and high-quality professional development for teachers is an urgent need that the Private Learning Network (PLN) promises to fulfill. The purpose of this qualitative case is to (a) examine, understand, and…"
Aug 11
Alexander Loew updated their profile
Jun 17
Shawn Mitchell replied to Janet Wilkins's discussion Essay Writing Structure!
"Essay writing is considered to be one of the most important things when it comes to writing skills, and so many students struggle with it. It’s hard for them to understand the basic essay writing structure and to help them with that, the…"
May 28
Shawn Mitchell replied to Tata Nech's discussion Hey People
"i hope you are good in this time. and you can learn new things about tech & e-learning and too many things. And i want to read more blogs about it."
May 7
Shawn Mitchell replied to George Danke's discussion Integration with The Latest Technology in Education Field
"Condition is worse due to Covid we cannot go anywhere and even universities and research labs are closed. Hope the situation will be normal soon. Then we can think about something else"
Apr 29
Tata Nech posted a blog post

More Than a Sport: A Look at Scootering’s Evolution

Too many people do not have a clear idea about what is a Scooter; and much less than there is a sport based on it. Besides, it is a sport that has evolved a lot from its beginning, but if you do not know too much about the sport is hard to see it as more than a kid game.However, this sport is more than just kids and young people making scooter tricks in a square; scootering is a kind of culture and a lifestyle that has more than 20 years growing to become what it is today.For this reason, we…See More
Apr 24
Shawn Mitchell replied to Rob Schoonveld's discussion Twitter vs Edupln
"My preference is this website is best. Twitter is used for social purpose and EDUPLN is used for professional discussion which you cannot discuss on social platforms."
Apr 14
Shawn Mitchell replied to Shanshan Ma's discussion Personalized learning network and social media
"Hi, There are too many platforms of social media and the member of those platform discuss so many things and participate. So it depends only on you where do you want to discuss."
Apr 14


© 2021   Created by Thomas Whitby.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service